Oracle Identity Manager vs SailPoint IIQ | Complete & Comprehensive User Guide
In this article we will get the complete idea about the differences between Oracle Identity Manager vs IdentityIQ. Let’s take a complete idea about the both in detail with their pros and cons so that we can decide which one is better for us.
Brief Introduction of Two Technology
Oracle Identity Manager authorize enterprises to supervises the whole user lifecycle overall enterprise support both inside and outside a firewall. It is one of the component of the Oracle Identity Management which is a programming software given by the Oracle corporations to provide Identity and access management technology. It facilitates organizations to mitigate risk, reduce IT costs and ensure compliance.
SailPoint IdentityIQ impart superior control and visibleness over users’ entry to data and applications while streamlining the entry request and distribution process. SailPoint, like the (Ping, ForgeRock, Oracle), aims to help companies safely and effectively deliver and supervise user access from any device to applications and data settled in the datacenter, in the cloud, and on the mobiles. SailPoint focus on governance which includes password management, provisioning, certification, reporting, audit, self-service and role mining is delivering feature-rich, user-friendly and offering a robust tool called identityIQ having its latest release as 7.0.
Difference between OIM and SailPoint IIQ
Now we will see the difference between the Oracle Identity Manager vs IdentityIQ by discussing the pros and cons of each. Hence, we will be able to decide which one is better and the best for us. Following is the comparison table of both.
Oracle Identity Manager | SailPoint IIQ |
|---|---|
| Pros | Pros |
| 1.OIM is ranked 1st in User Provisioning Software. | 1.IdentityIQ is ranked 2nd in User Provisioning Software. |
| 2. The top reviewer of Oracle Identity Manager says, “It provides a continuous user interface and technical support very effectively”. | 2. The top reviewer of SailPoint IdentityIQ says, “Customized Data Imports and Role Modeling”. |
| 3. OIM in organization has upgraded its dependability and use, by allowing user to pass probe each time. | 3. The level of customization for role modelling and data import, because it helps to join fast, support easier and make it reusable for the organization role structure. |
| 4. It helps provision the required accesses through policies, consents, and whatever would be the business need. By spotting connector framework for unifying provisioning capabilities from OIM. | 4. Automatically provisioning platform, certification because it assists with automated provisioning end users based on careful roles, in grace profiles, over different applications. What was very tangled can be simplified if implemented correctly and properly. |
| 5. The most notable features that have impacted our environment these days are the Single Sign-On solution, automated provisioning and the role-based provisioning of accounts to target systems. | 5. Administration and security for any current access. Supervise search and process information. |
| 6. The proactive controls which can be configured to a granular level by giving the organization the flexibility to meet the upcoming demands of the workforce. | 6. SailPoint IIQ simplifies access governance by providing an OOTB module for certification. Administrators can schedule, create and design certification with just a few clicks. |
| Cons | Cons |
| 1.Oracle really hasn’t involved or defined what and how they’re going to do that. They’ve been connecting these two products for a very long time, Oracle Identity Manager (OIM) and Oracle Identity Analytics. There’s still that component that’s still outlying. | 1.It is required to focus on automation wherein provisioning of work can be improved and access certification should be automated without the intervention from a manager for approval. |
| 2. Automation of validation dispatched by humans over Recon Exceptions generated as an outcome of an access synchronization event over a user’s need for access or not. I would like to see much more segregation managed by Oracle Identity Manager | 2. Few equipment’s should be added to the interface and in the program and could be made manageable. Additional details during account aggregation failures to assist fast troubleshooting |
| 3.The unrevealed architecture of the product is quite complex and rigid to support and troubleshoot. Self-Service capabilities are quite restrained, and the out-of-box capabilities are less, and customizations are quite complex. | 3. It should have authentication modules as well. The advanced provided features need many more improvement. |
| 4. It is inconvenient to install; there are multiple layers in terms of trying to involve it to work; they’re also restricted in terms of the number of products it can combine with. | 4. Oracle licenses are expensive. We advise making pricing and licensing decisions that fix with architectural requirements and the project’s budget. |
Conclusion
Above we discussed about the Oracle Identity Manager vs IdentityIQ. And as per our discussion, we came to know that both the technology has pros and cons but while coming to be the user-friendliness the Oracle Identity Manager is much more expensive than the SailPoint IdentityIQ. So, most of the people prefer to go for the training in SailPoint Identity IIQ as it is very trending and demanding technology in the market these days. So if also want to get trained in this highly demanded technology follow the link given.
Oracle Identity Manager Training
SailPoint IdentityIQ Training
